Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Valentine's Day card - News by PLAZOO

valentine's Day card: Support ← Previous revision Revision as of 10:59, 30 October 2009 Line 10: Line 10: * '''Support''' A good image, still creeping me out, but with decent EV and of high caliber.  ((User:Nezzadar|'''Nezzadar''')) ((User talk:Nezzadar|(SPEAK)))  04:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC) * '''Support''' A good image, still creeping me out, but with decent EV and of high caliber.  ((User:Nezzadar|'''Nezzadar''')) ((User talk:Nezzadar|(SPEAK)))  04:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC) :'''Comment''': I understand your feeling - the image is quite surreal. Is that the way ((valentine's Day)) is described in the article? ((User:Elekhh|Elekhh)) (((User talk:Elekhh|talk))) 06:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC) :'''Comment''': I understand your feeling - the image is quite surreal. Is that the way ((valentine's Day)) is described in the article? ((User:Elekhh|Elekhh)) (((User talk:Elekhh|talk))) 06:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC) - *'''Comment''': Nothing makes me want to buy flowers and have sex like babies on string. Do we not have an article on the company? Is it ((Louis Prang))? If so, this would drastically include his article... ((User:J Milburn|J Milburn)) (((User talk:J Milburn|talk))) 11:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC) + *'''Comment''': Nothing makes me want to buy flowers and have sex like babies on string. Do we not have an article on the company? Is it ((Louis Prang))? If so, this would drastically <s> include </s> ''improve'' his article... ((User:J Milburn|J Milburn)) (((User talk:J Milburn|talk))) 11:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC) **Possibly; will double check. :) ((User:Durova|Durova))''((User talk:Durova|348))'' 14:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC) **Possibly; will double check. :) ((User:Durova|Durova))''((User talk:Durova|348))'' 14:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC) ***You appear to be quite right.(http://books.google.com/books?id=lJIVAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA317&dq=Louis+Prang&ei=-bfpSoybEojylQTC6IWWDA#v=onepage&q=Louis%20Prang&f=false) Think it would be on the safe side of NOR to attribute this to his firm and use at his article? ((User:Durova|Durova))''((User talk:Durova|348))'' 16:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC) ***You appear to be quite right.(http://books.google.com/books?id=lJIVAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA317&dq=Louis+Prang&ei=-bfpSoybEojylQTC6IWWDA#v=onepage&q=Louis%20Prang&f=false) Think it would be on the safe side of NOR to attribute this to his firm and use at his article? ((User:Durova|Durova))''((User talk:Durova|348))'' 16:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC) ****Why not, spread the creepy babies around!  ((User:Nezzadar|'''Nezzadar''')) ((User talk:Nezzadar|(SPEAK)))  19:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC) ****Why not, spread the creepy babies around!  ((User:Nezzadar|'''Nezzadar''')) ((User talk:Nezzadar|(SPEAK)))  19:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC) *****Okay, done. ((User:Durova|Durova))''((User talk:Durova|348))'' 19:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC) *****Okay, done. ((User:Durova|Durova))''((User talk:Durova|348))'' 19:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC) + ******Cool. '''Support''' for the use on the Prang article. ((User:J Milburn|J Milburn)) (((User talk:J Milburn|talk))) 10:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC) *'''Support''' I'll pretend to take credit for finding this even though you already had it. ((User:Staxringold|Staxringold)) ((User talk:Staxringold|talk))((Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs)) 20:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC) *'''Support''' I'll pretend to take credit for finding this even though you already had it. ((User:Staxringold|Staxringold)) ((User talk:Staxringold|talk))((Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs)) 20:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC) *'''Support''' on basis of EV for ((Louis Prang)). ((User:Elekhh|Elekhh)) (((User talk:Elekhh|talk))) 23:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC) *'''Support''' on basis of EV for ((Louis Prang)). ((User:Elekhh|Elekhh)) (((User talk:Elekhh|talk))) 23:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)